Teacher feedback
The student effectively argued against the use of the SAT, highlighting its disproportionate impact on low-income students. They emphasized the financial burden of SAT preparation on these students and proposed the need for alternative measures of academic evaluation.
Key arguments
- 01The SAT disproportionately disadvantages students from low-income backgrounds who cannot afford preparation resources.
- 02Access to free resources does not equalize opportunities, as many students need paid guidance and tutoring.
- 03There should be alternative assessments that account for the privilege some students have due to their family's affluence.
Next focus
Practice forming more complex sentences and reducing reliance on filler phrases to improve clarity and fluency.
Language observations+
- •The student used phrases like 'rich people's game' to convey their point informally, which may affect the formality of their argument.
- •They demonstrated some fluency, but pauses and filler phrases ('I mean', 'you know what I mean?') were noticeable.
- •Grammatical structures were mostly correct, but sentence clarity could be improved, especially when expressing complex ideas.